Analysis of Linguistic Style Accommodation in Online Debates
نویسندگان
چکیده
Psycholinguistic phenomenon of communication accommodation (Giles et al., 1991) is probably one of the most important contributions in the interdisciplinary field of linguistics, psychology, information, and communication theory. Existing works have applied this theory to various domains like gesture, linguistics, backchannels, and even social media like tweets. In this work, we analyze the psycholinguistic phenomenon of linguistic style accommodation in online debates. First, we present a Joint Topic Expression (JTE) model for modeling debate posts and use it to generate our unique dataset for studying accommodation in debates. Specifically, we analyze the phenomenon across agreeing/disagreeing debating pairs generated using our JTE model. Second, we propose a formal framework for analyzing the linguistic phenomena of accommodation in online debates. Experiments on a large collection of real-life debate posts reveal very interesting insights about the complex phenomenon of psycholinguistic accommodation in online debates.
منابع مشابه
Mimicry Is Presidential: Linguistic Style Matching in Presidential Debates and Improved Polling Numbers
The current research used the contexts of U.S. presidential debates and negotiations to examine whether matching the linguistic style of an opponent in a two-party exchange affects the reactions of third-party observers. Building off communication accommodation theory (CAT), interaction alignment theory (IAT), and processing fluency, we propose that language style matching (LSM) will improve su...
متن کاملLinguistic Style Accommodation in Disagreements
We investigate style accommodation in online discussions, in particular its interplay with content agreement and disagreement. Using a new model for measuring style accommodation, we find that speakers coordinate on style more noticeably if they disagree than if they agree, especially if they want to establish rapport and possibly persuade their interlocutors.
متن کاملThe effect of language complexity and group size on knowledge construction: Implications for online learning
This study investigated the effect of language complexity and group size on knowledge construction in two online debates. Knowledge construction was assessed using Gunawardena et al.’s Interaction Analysis Model (1997). Language complexity was determined by dividing the number of unique words by total words. It refers to the lexical variation. The results showed that...
متن کاملAn Investigation of the Online Farsi Translation of Metadiscourse Markers in American Presidential Debates
The term metadiscourse rarely appears in translation studies despite the continuously growing body of research on discourse markers in different genres and through various perspectives. Translation as a product that needs to observe such markers for their communicative power and contribution to the overall coherence of a text within a context has not been satisfactorily studied. Motivated by su...
متن کاملWinning on the Merits: The Joint Effects of Content and Style on Debate Outcomes
Debate and deliberation play essential roles in politics and government, but most models presume that debates are won mainly via superior style or agenda control. Ideally, however, debates would be won on the merits, as a function of which side has the stronger arguments. We propose a predictive model of debate that estimates the effects of linguistic features and the latent persuasive strength...
متن کامل